The United States’ status as a global hegemon has long been characterized by its dominant economic, military, and cultural influence worldwide. However, the foreign policy of the Trump administration, particularly under its second term, has raised significant questions about the future of this dominance. The America First approach, adopted passionately by President Donald Trump, emphasized national self-interest over global collaboration and long-term alliances. Critics argue that this strategy has weakened international cooperation at a time when rising powers such as China, Russia and to some extent India are expanding their influence on the global stage. As America grapples with its shifting role, a closer examination of the drawbacks of its foreign policy under Trump reveals critical implications for the country’s standing in an increasingly multipolar world.
The America First doctrine marked a significant departure from the multilateralism that had defined US foreign policy for decades. Under Trump’s leadership, the focus has shifted to transactional relationships that prioritize immediate gains over collaborative efforts to address global challenges. This approach became apparent in various policy decisions, such as the withdrawal from the Paris Agreement on climate change, the Iran nuclear deal, and the trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP); during the first term of Trump. Such actions not only alienated traditional allies but also undermined the United States’ leadership role in key global issues, which are often best addressed through collective action and diplomacy. Same route has been followed under the second term as well, which is definitely proving as the hallmark of the America First Policy. Trump only wants to interact with those countries who are willing to invest heavily in the US.
By sidelining multilateral platforms, Trump’s foreign policy reduced the US’s ability to influence global norms and standards. Soon, Trump took charge, he immediately suspended various programs such as USAID and funds to the projects work under UN. The absence of American leadership in international agreements has allowed other nations, particularly China, to step into the void, thereby reshaping global governance structures in a manner that reflects their strategic interests. As a result, the US risks losing its position as a shaper of global order, ceding ground to rivals poised to challenge American values and interests.
One of the most glaring drawbacks of Trump’s foreign policy has been its detrimental impact on long-standing alliances. Relations with traditional allies, such as the European Union and NATO member states, became strained due to Trump’s confrontational rhetoric and perceived disregard for mutual commitments. The president’s criticism of NATO allies for not meeting defense spending targets created an atmosphere of distrust and uncertainty among partners who had relied on the United States for security guarantees since the Cold War.
This erosion of trust poses significant risks. As alliances weaken, opportunities for coordinated responses to shared threats diminish, leaving nations vulnerable in an increasingly hostile global environment. The challenges posed by authoritarian regimes and transnational issues, such as terrorism and cyber threats, require cooperative strategies and synchronized efforts that are threatened by the isolationist tendencies of the Trump administration. Without a strong, unified front, the influence of the US in international security and diplomacy continues to wane.
The America First approach significantly altered US economic relationships through the initiation of trade wars, particularly with China. The imposition of tariffs aimed at protecting American manufacturing and jobs led to significant retaliatory measures from other countries, resulting in a trade stalemate that has hampered global economic growth. These aggressive trade policies further alienated allies who depend on trade partnerships with the US while encouraging countries like China to strengthen their economic alliances with developing nations.
Moreover, Trump’s focus on short-term economic gains often neglected the long-term impacts of such isolationist policies. By prioritizing unilateral action over multilateral trade agreements, the US risks being sidelined in the emerging global economic landscape, where strategic partnerships and alliances increasingly dictate economic power. The consequences of this paradigm shift could lead to diminished American economic leadership and influence, making it harder for the US to shape global economic policies in the future.
Historically, the US has positioned itself as a champion of human rights and democratic values worldwide. However, the Trump administration’s foreign policy often overlooked these principles in favor of realpolitik and transactional relationships. The willingness to overlook the authoritarian tendencies of leaders in countries like UAE and Saudi Arabia in exchange for strategic or economic benefits signaled a troubling retreat from the promotion of democracy and human rights. Such a shift not only damages the moral authority of the United States but also emboldens authoritarian regimes worldwide, undermining efforts to foster democratic governance and respect for human rights. As emerging powers like China and Russia continue to assert their influence, the absence of a strong US commitment to these values compromises the foundational principles that have guided American foreign policy for decades.
As the US grapples with its internal challenges and international standing, rival powers are seizing the opportunity to expand their influence. China’s Belt and Road Initiative, which aims to enhance infrastructure and economic ties across Asia and beyond, exemplifies how alternative models of engagement are gaining traction. Meanwhile, Russia’s assertiveness in regions like Eastern Europe and the Middle East showcases a willingness to challenge US influence where it once prevailed unchallenged. In this shifting landscape, the declining dominance of the US is increasingly evident. The challenge will be how the US adapts to this new reality. A reconsideration of its foreign policy, moving beyond an isolationist stance toward a more inclusive and cooperative approach, may be essential to restore its global standing and influence.
The author is a researcher, columnist, and the founder of Political Frontline. He holds a master degree in International Relations and has a wide experience of writing in various news forums on issues related to diplomacy, conflict and political economy. He tweets on @BarkatViews2.